The Difference Between Leadership and Management

The words “Manager” and “Leader” are used interchangeably. It was once believed that effectively managing an organisation was principally a matter of managing its structures and processes. Professor Abraham Zaleznik (Harvard Business School - 1977) challenged this view, arguing that there was another aspect to management, concerned with vision, inspiration, and the human side of things. 

Using Zaleznik’s work as a foundation, John P. Kotter argued that effectively managing organisations required a balance between management and leadership, in which he postulated that there were two distinct aspects. He cited the key differences between a Manager and an effective Leader as:

Managers:

  • Focus and follow specific processes
  • Prioritise stability and control
  • Have positional authority
  • Exercise control

Leaders:

  • Challenge the status quo
  • Are patient within chaos and a lack of structure
  • Create a vision
  • Guide people through change
  • May have authority, which is not a necessary condition for demonstrating Leadership

However, it is critical to note that these differences don't make one approach (Manager or Leader) better than the other, as organisations need strong Managers and effective Leaders. Many organisations are overly-managed and under-led, which makes it essential to nurture the development of practical Leadership skills. Anyone within an organisation can be a great Leader. Leaders encourage autonomy to engender a level of self-motivation in staff.

Research suggests that there isn’t necessarily a one-size-fits-all approach to effective Leadership. Instead, leading from a person’s unique strengths yields better results than trying to emulate other Leaders. This does have connotations as effective Leaders come in many diverse forms, with different strengths and weaknesses in Leadership styles that work effectively within a given set of circumstances and environments. What is seen as weak Leadership in one given set of circumstances may prove to be a strength elsewhere.

Revolutionary Leadership styles may work best in entrepreneurial environments where change can be engendered instantly without any barriers to change being encountered. In more stable environments where people are reluctant and unengaged towards change, leadership styles may be based on longer-term goals, aspirations, and attainments. Effective Leaders know, embrace, and capitalise upon their strengths while also acknowledging and managing their weaknesses within a suitable organisational culture.

The concept of culture combines a range of elements from people’s upbringing, history, and community, resulting in many characteristics that can cause cultural differences in the workplace. A diverse workplace contains people of different ages, experiences, religions, and economic backgrounds. Some of the key cultural aspects that impact Leadership within an organisation are:

  • Generational
  • Ethnic
  • Religious
  • Educational

The most effective Leaders incessantly focus on their team's strengths, empowering each staff member to do their best to contribute to achieving the team and organisation's goals and objectives. Focusing on staff strengths usually leads to higher staff engagement and well-being, huge gains in the organisation’s financial performance, and the greatest attainment of customer service. 

The critical role of a leader is to ensure that the staff, team, and organisational vision and operational aims and objectives come together as one, most efficiently and effectively utilising the minimum of resources. 

Effective Leaders recognise that they can’t excel at everything; they surround themselves with people who have complementary strengths, qualities, and skill sets, resulting in high-performing teams. However, they also understand and honour the four basic needs that team members have within the team: 

  • Trust
  • Stability
  • Hope
  • Compassion 

People are motivated to collaborate with Leaders they can depend on, who genuinely care about them, provide a solid and reliable foundation, and inspire them with hope for the future. A combination of these generic qualities and self-awareness is a crucial factor that makes for an effective leader. Traits that the most effective Leaders possess include:

  • Communication skills 
  • Negotiation abilities
  • Emotional intelligence
  • People empathy
  • Moral integrity
  • Creativity ingenuity

The primary difference between a Manager and a Leader is that a Manager depends primarily on their skills, whilst Leaders depend on their characteristics. Effective Managers possess three essential skills:

  • Functional and technical knowledge and abilities
  • People and team management 
  • Operational conceptual skills

Effective Leaders use six primary Leadership styles to influence an organisation effectively:

  • Visionary
  • Coaching 
  • Affiliative 
  • Democratic 
  • Pacesetting
  • Commanding

The biggest issue for most organisations is translating their strategic intent into the tactical and operational plans required to establish their goals and objectives. There is a perception that Leaders only exist at the higher levels of management; however, a truly effective organisation understands that Leaders exist at all levels of the management structure.

Of primary importance for an organisation is being able to translate the strategic organisational vision into a Mission Statement that the rest of the organisation will “buy” into. The critical success elements of the vision must be aligned with the personal beliefs and ambitions of those who can translate the Mission Statement into tactical and operational plans to achieve the organisation's goals and objectives.

Most organisations fail to understand that translating the organisation's vision into a strategy may not happen at the higher levels of management or within the functions traditionally responsible for setting the organisation's strategic intent. The translation of vision into strategy increasingly occurs within the middle management structure.

The great danger is that the political intent of senior management quite often stifles and chokes this transformation, especially if the resultant strategy does not align with the organisation's visionary intent or where the political intent of specific senior Managers is allowed to have an unfair or unjustified level of impact upon the middle management structure's abilities to lead effectively within an otherwise entrepreneurial environment.

Additional articles can be found at People Management Made Easy. This site looks at people management issues to assist organisations and managers in increasing the quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of their services and products to the customers' delight. ©️ People Management Made Easy. All rights reserved.