The work environment within
organisational management is dynamic and stressful. Conflict can be expected
when two or more stakeholders have different opinions or interests. It can
occur, and team managers can spend much time managing it and the resultant
fallout. Conflicts happen for many reasons, such as schedule priorities, scarce
resources, political or technical reasons, and personal issues.
If appropriately managed,
conflict resolution can build trust and sometimes bring new ideas and
opportunities. Proper conflict resolution can differentiate between positive
and negative outcomes, and an incorrect solution can negatively affect an
organisation.
Suppose a team manager fails
to resolve conflicts effectively. In that case, their team Members will lose
trust in them and each other, weakening the team's ability to work together and
detracting from an organisation’s success. A team manager must deal with
conflict before it is beyond repair. The following are a few consequences of
improper conflict resolution:
- Low team morale.
- Negative impact on the team
manager’s authority.
- Increased number of personal
clashes.
- Low productivity and efficiency.
- Low-quality work.
A team manager must often
monitor and resolve conflicts quickly to prevent them from becoming
significant. There are typically five conflict resolution techniques, amongst
others:
- Withdraw/Avoid.
- Smooth/Accommodate.
- Compromise/Reconcile.
- Force/Direct.
- Collaborate/Problem Solve.
To discuss each technique in
more detail:
Withdraw or Avoid: In this conflict
resolution technique, a team manager can avoid the conflict or retreat and
allow it to resolve itself. This technique is beneficial when the stakes are
low and the conflict will likely disappear, and can be used in the following
cases:
- Individuals involved in the
conflict are not significant stakeholders.
- The issue can be a manageable time
investment.
- An intense argument has already
happened, and individuals need time to cool off.
- If the team manager does not have
enough information to use other techniques.
This technique saves time
that a team manager can invest in other productive activities. It is an
excellent approach to apply to low-level conflicts, giving the team manager
enough time to prepare if the conflict re-emerges.
However, withdrawing from or
avoiding a conflict may weaken the team manager's position because parties may
assume that the team manager has an unfair bias and lacks the skills and
authority to deal with disputes.
The main issue with this
conflict resolution technique is that it could be argued that it is not a
dispute management technique because it avoids conflict when it arises. A team
manager needs to act quickly to avoid the negative impacts of disputes and
arguments.
Smooth or Accommodate: This technique deals with
finding areas of agreement, tries to smooth the situation, and circumvents
challenging discussions. In smoothing, a team manager gives more consideration
to one party than the other.
The team manager tries to
downplay the seriousness of the situation and behaves as if the problem never
existed. This technique is helpful in the following cases:
- More time is needed to deal with
the conflict.
- When a temporary solution to the
problem is required.
- If the conflict is minor and
involves less influential stakeholders.
This technique requires
little effort. A team manager can focus on essential issues while ignoring
unimportant arguments. The situation can be handled simply while bringing
harmony, creating goodwill, and providing enough time to find a permanent
solution.
Suppose a team manager needs
to bring a balanced approach to smoothing. In that case, one party may take
advantage of the situation since the team manager is giving them more
consideration, and members of the party not being accommodated may question the
team manager's authority or stop reporting conflicts. This technique is not
recommended as it often weakens the team manager’s control.
Compromise or Reconcile: A team manager takes
suggestions from both sides and tries to partially satisfy both parties. This
technique is valid when the stakeholders involved in the conflict hold equal
power. A team manager may use this technique in the following cases:
- All parties involved in the
conflict need to win.
- When the team manager has an equal
relationship with both parties.
- Collaborative and forcing
techniques have yet to work.
- When a team manager needs a
temporary solution to move forward quickly.
This technique brings quick
results, lowers stress, and keeps all parties placated until a permanent
solution is found. A team manager can solve a conflict and gain enough time to
find a better solution. However, this technique only generates trust in the
short run.
All parties remain
unsatisfied, and the conflict could resurface at any time. Morale is not being
built. The team manager may be required to intervene sooner to ensure all
parties abide by the agreement.
Force or Direct: A team manager agrees with
one party’s viewpoint and enforces their wishes. This is a win-lose situation
and risks demoralising the team. This conflict-resolution technique can be used
in the following cases:
- When a team manager needs a quick
solution.
- Where it is easy to define when one
party is correct and the other is incorrect.
- When the stakeholders on the
conflict's losing side are unimportant.
- If the relationship with those
stakeholders is not essential.
This technique provides a
quick solution to the problem. It requires almost no effort from the team
manager and may help establish the team manager’s authority. However, using
this technique may leave a negative impression on the team manager and result
in opportunities lost from the opposing party's viewpoint. A team manager must
refrain from applying this technique with high-power stakeholders, as sometimes
it may backfire and worsen the conflict.
Collaborate or Problem Solve: In this technique, a team
manager discusses the issue with all parties to agree on a solution while
considering multiple viewpoints. The team manager may use this technique in the
following cases:
- When a team manager wants to
incorporate multiple views.
- If the people involved in the
conflict are influential.
- When a consensus is required.
- If the team manager wants to
distribute responsibility equally to all parties.
This fundamental
problem-solving technique gives a final solution to the conflict. It brings
consensus, commitment, and shared responsibility for the outcome. This
technique creates a win-win situation as it builds confidence in the team,
earns respect, and establishes authority.
A team manager cannot use
this technique with all conflicts when they need a quick solution, because it
takes time and effort. It is generally used for disputes which may severely
affect an organisation.
Conflicts exist throughout an organisation as people battle to find solutions
to arguments, disputes, or differences of opinion. They can occur as people
struggle to find their place within a team, for political reasons or because of
a genuine difference of opinion based on their knowledge surrounding the
dispute at the time it occurs.
People involved in disputes
become fixated on winning the battle, come what may, leading to wasted time and
effort that could be more effectively used to achieve the organisation's aims
and objectives. Dispute resolution skills can be used to great effect to reduce
this impact on organisational cohesiveness.
How and when differences of
opinion are settled affects the morale of the rest of the organisation and the
reputation of the team manager within whose area the dispute occurs. The key is
to settle the dispute as quickly as possible to the satisfaction of all
concerned to prevent it from affecting organisational efficiency and
effectiveness.
Additional articles can be
found at People Management Made Easy. This site looks at people
management issues to assist organisations and managers in increasing the
quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of their services and products to the
customers' delight. ©️ People Management Made Easy. All rights reserved.