A UK dealership of imported
European-manufactured construction equipment procured branded Personal
Protective Equipment (PPE) and uniforms for its Field Service Engineers that
failed to take account of the industries that the dealership operated in,
leading to PPE being purchased that put its Field Service Engineers at serious
risk of death or severe injury.
The UK dealership operated in a diverse range of industries, each with its distinct requirements for PPE that the dealership failed to consider when procuring the PPE, including:
The PPE and uniforms procured were dark blue and grey, with limited reflective flashings, severely limiting the visibility of the dealership's Field Service Engineers during inclement weather at night. Such working conditions hampered staff visibility when attending breakdowns of construction equipment in remote areas of the UK.
Organisations are required, as set out in the guidelines defined by the Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992, to ensure that suitable PPE is provided for staff who may be exposed to high-risk levels to their health or safety whilst at work, except where the threat to health and safety has been adequately controlled by other equal or more effective means of risk limitation.
The process used to procure the dealership's requirement for PPE was restricted to a few Suppliers being requested to quote for a limited number of items, where the dealership had not expressly or adequately specified the PPE requirement. In failing to prepare a specification of requirements, the few Suppliers that were requested to quote for the PPE and uniform failed to understand the following:
The PPE procured severely limited staff visibility at night in adverse weather conditions and was expensive, unsuitable, and disliked by the dealership's Field Service Engineers. The quality of the PPE was poor, meaning replacement PPE items were required more than anticipated. With extended lead times, staff had to wear substandard PPE whilst awaiting replacement items to be delivered by the supplier.
The fundamental role of the procurement process is to assist an organisation by providing a process that enables the selection of Suppliers:
The UK dealership operated in a diverse range of industries, each with its distinct requirements for PPE that the dealership failed to consider when procuring the PPE, including:
- Road.
- Rail.
- Construction.
- Mineral extraction.
- Mining.
The PPE and uniforms procured were dark blue and grey, with limited reflective flashings, severely limiting the visibility of the dealership's Field Service Engineers during inclement weather at night. Such working conditions hampered staff visibility when attending breakdowns of construction equipment in remote areas of the UK.
Organisations are required, as set out in the guidelines defined by the Personal Protective Equipment at Work Regulations 1992, to ensure that suitable PPE is provided for staff who may be exposed to high-risk levels to their health or safety whilst at work, except where the threat to health and safety has been adequately controlled by other equal or more effective means of risk limitation.
The process used to procure the dealership's requirement for PPE was restricted to a few Suppliers being requested to quote for a limited number of items, where the dealership had not expressly or adequately specified the PPE requirement. In failing to prepare a specification of requirements, the few Suppliers that were requested to quote for the PPE and uniform failed to understand the following:
- The industries that the dealership operated in.
- The specific PPE requirements of each industrial sector.
- The intimate PPE needs of the dealership's staff.
- The hostility of the working environment in which the PPE would be worn.
The PPE procured severely limited staff visibility at night in adverse weather conditions and was expensive, unsuitable, and disliked by the dealership's Field Service Engineers. The quality of the PPE was poor, meaning replacement PPE items were required more than anticipated. With extended lead times, staff had to wear substandard PPE whilst awaiting replacement items to be delivered by the supplier.
The fundamental role of the procurement process is to assist an organisation by providing a process that enables the selection of Suppliers:
- Through group consensus.
- Without bias.
- That is fair, open, and transparent.
- Gets the most experienced staff involved in the selection process.
- Establishing requirements.
- Researching the market.
- Evaluating suppliers.
- Negotiating contracts.
- Managing risk.
- Reduce its ongoing costs.
- Understand the risks and opportunities involved.
- Consider and limit health and safety risks.
- Elicit data to assist in decision-making.
- Provide insight into potential suppliers.
The procurement process must be simple, easy to understand, and operate to mitigate all organisational commercial and health and safety risks but, more importantly, reduce the risk of death and serious injury to staff.
Additional articles can be found at People Management Made Easy. This site looks at commercial management issues to assist organisations and people in increasing the quality, efficiency, and effectiveness of their products and service supply to the customers' delight. ©️ People Management Made Easy. All rights reserved.